Risk Attribute

Explosion Protection Concept (ATEX)

Expert-reviewed Updated: 2026-09-03 Expert-reviewed: 2026-09-04 (Guido Hesse, Hesse Group Holding AG) Version 0.1.0

Explosion protection concept confirms whether locations handling flammable gases, vapours or combustible dusts have a documented ATEX- compliant explosion protection concept with hazardous area classification, as queried in property insurance proposal forms.

Category
Fire protection
Data type
Yes/No
Risk drivers
Severity, Accumulation
Underwriting impact
Premium, Condition/Warranty, Exclusion, Declinature

Typical proposal-form questions

  • Does the location have a documented explosion protection concept with hazardous area classification (zones) for areas handling flammable gases, vapours or combustible dusts?
  • Is equipment installed in classified zones certified to the appropriate ATEX category, and is this documented in an equipment inventory?
  • Are primary and secondary explosion protection measures (e.g. explosion venting, suppression, isolation) implemented where prevention alone is insufficient?

Evidence

  • Explosion protection document (Explosionsschutzdokument) / hazardous area classification drawings
  • Equipment conformity certificates (ATEX marking)
  • Explosion venting/suppression system design documentation

Why it matters for underwriting

Where flammable gases, vapours or combustible dusts are present, an ignition source that would be harmless elsewhere can trigger an explosion capable of destroying a building instantly and causing extended business interruption, well beyond what a comparable fire loss would produce. A documented explosion protection concept, built on systematic hazardous area classification, is the primary evidence that an insured has identified where these atmospheres can occur and has matched equipment, ignition sources and protective measures to that reality rather than relying on informal judgement.

Capturing the attribute and evidence

Proposal forms ask whether zones handling flammable gases, vapours or combustible dusts have been classified and documented, whether installed equipment is ATEX-certified for its zone, and whether venting, suppression or isolation measures are in place where prevention cannot fully eliminate the risk. Underwriters request the explosion protection document with classification drawings, the equipment conformity inventory, and design documentation for any explosion venting or suppression systems, since a classification exercise without matching certified equipment leaves the underlying hazard largely uncontrolled.

Effect on coverage, premium and conditions

A current, complete concept with certified equipment and appropriate secondary protection supports standard rating for otherwise hazardous occupancies and demonstrates that the exposure is actively managed. A missing or outdated concept, uncertified equipment in classified zones, or the absence of secondary protection where needed typically triggers a condition requiring remediation within a defined period, explosion-specific exclusions, or, for high-hazard processes without any documented concept, declinature until the gap is closed.

Mitigation measures

Where a concept is missing, incomplete or outdated, insurers and risk engineers typically recommend commissioning a hazardous area classification by a qualified specialist, replacing or certifying equipment to match the classified zones, and installing secondary protection such as explosion venting, suppression or isolation where primary prevention alone cannot adequately control the risk.

Standards and codes

  • ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management, Guidelines
  • IEC/ISO 31010:2019 – Risk assessment techniques